Find the weakness.
Prove the risk.
Your product moves fast. Your security testing should too.
Autonomous investigation. Replayable proof. A clear path to fix.
Less noise.
More certainty.
Security testing should explain what an attacker can actually do. SuperPentest connects application context, attack paths and evidence in one investigation.
Can one tenant
see another’s data?
A valid login should never be a pass into someone else’s account. Test how your application enforces ownership across tenant boundaries.
Customer billing information exposed across accounts.
Cross-tenant access
GET /api/invoices/inv_B403GET /api/invoices/inv_B200A valid session retrieves an invoice belonging to another tenant.
Inspect the validation
An unauthenticated request is denied. The authenticated ownership check is then tested separately.
REPLAYThe same boundary violation is reproduced in three matching test replays.
From a starting point.
To a proven finding.
See how an authorized investigation becomes evidence your team can use. Follow each step, or explore at your own pace.
Set the rules.
Before the first request.
Define the application, test accounts and boundaries. Every step of the investigation starts inside your agreed scope.
app.example.com · approved test identities · limits setA finding.
With the proof
to back it up.
Give your team a starting point. Understand the affected boundary, inspect the behavior and see where the control should change.
Walk through a finding with usCross-tenant
invoice retrieval
Tenant A can access an invoice owned by Tenant B using a valid authenticated session.
Customer billing information exposed across an account boundary.
Enforce tenant ownership before returning the requested invoice.
Good questions.
Clear answers.
How is this different from a vulnerability scanner?
SuperPentest investigates attack paths in context, compares control behavior and replays findings. The aim is supported evidence that explains impact, rather than an unvalidated list of signals.
Can you test authenticated applications?
Yes. With authorized test accounts and the right application context, engagements can explore roles, object ownership and tenant boundaries. We agree on the supported scope together.
How do we control the testing?
Authorized assets, test identities, execution limits and stop conditions are agreed before the first request. Testing stays within that engagement scope.
What happens in the first meeting?
We discuss your application, your security goals and the boundaries you want tested. Then we define what a focused initial engagement could cover.
Your attack surface.
Our starting point.
Bring your application.
We’ll map out the right first engagement.